Governance Maturity Trend(4.4.10)

This is the longitudinal view of governance maturity. Rather than showing a snapshot, it shows how the composite maturity score for each project has evolved over time — whether projects are improving toward the 60-point minimum threshold, stabilising above it, or drifting below it.

For executive reporting and compliance evidence, a trend line moving consistently above the minimum threshold is the most important governance signal you can demonstrate.

What you can conclude

• A project consistently above the 60-point minimum threshold is meeting baseline governance requirements — suitable for compliance reporting.
• A project trending toward or below the threshold requires intervention — governance practices are deteriorating.
• A portfolio where all projects are above the threshold and trending upward demonstrates a culture of improving governance maturity.

How this chart works

Multi-line time series showing weekly composite governance maturity score per project. The composite averages the dimensions that could be measured that week -- workflow adherence, accountability, and control coverage. A week that can measure fewer than two of the three is left unscored and breaks the line, rather than publishing a single dimension as though it were the composite. A 60-point minimum target threshold line is overlaid. Use the date and project filters to track specific teams or periods.

The week in progress is shown at its value so far. Because the week is not yet complete, it is marked as still in progress and does not enter the trend comparison.