Top Solo-Close Actors(5.2.10)

When approval gaps concentrate in specific individuals, it may not be a team culture problem — it may be a specific process or role issue. This table identifies the actors with the highest counts of solo closures so that compliance investigations can be targeted appropriately rather than applied broadly.

What you can conclude

• An actor with a high solo-close count and a high solo-close percentage may be deliberately bypassing approval requirements — worth a direct compliance conversation.
• An actor with a high absolute count but a low percentage may just be very active — context matters.
• A clean table with no actors above threshold indicates that approval discipline is consistent across the team.

How this chart works

Ranked table showing actors by count of solo closures (creator = closer), their solo-close percentage of closures with an attributable creator, their primary project, and a risk tier label. Counts and percentages cover delivered closures only; discards are backlog hygiene and are not counted, and an actor whose closures carry no attribution evidence shows no count rather than a zero. Use the date and project filters to focus on specific periods.

Teams preparing a DORA or NIS2 review use this to identify who to ask about first.