Permission Drift Score by Actor(5.3.10)

Rather than requiring a compliance investigator to manually check five separate signals per actor, this table aggregates all permission drift signals into a single score. Actors with high scores have exhibited multiple access-expansion and accountability-bypass patterns simultaneously — making them the highest priority for investigation.

What you can conclude

• Actors with scores above 70 are flagged as high risk — multiple concurrent signals suggest a pattern, not a coincidence.
• Actors in the 40–69 range warrant monitoring — one or two signals are present but not yet at an escalation threshold.
• Actors below 40 show no significant permission drift signals — no action required.

How this chart works

Ranked table showing actors with a composite permission drift score (0 to 100), built from three signals measured per actor per week: reporter changes, the number of distinct projects the actor was active in, and their self-assignment rate. Color-coded: red (70 or above), amber (40 to 69), green (below 40).

The self-assignment term uses the same definition as the Self-Assignment Rate by Project chart on this page: self-assignments divided by assignee changes, not by overall edit volume. That rate is shown in the table next to the number of assignee changes it was measured over, so a rate resting on two changes can be told apart from one resting on ninety. An actor who made no assignee changes at all in the week shows a blank rate and contributes nothing to this term; the rest of their score still reflects the other two signals. Use the date and project filters to focus on specific periods.