Portfolio Composite Score(4.4.1)

A blended governance score across the portfolio: the average of the per-project dimensions that can be measured (workflow adherence, accountability, control coverage). The single number used to communicate governance posture to executives and external reviewers. Site-wide configuration change activity is shown separately, since configuration is site-scoped rather than per-project. This card reads the latest complete week and names the week it read. The week in progress is left out rather than averaged: only the projects that have already logged events appear in a part-finished week, so its value would be an average over a different set of projects rather than an early reading of the same one. If the only week in the selected range is still in progress, no score is shown. The charts further down the page are not all restricted this way; the Actor Accountability Rate chart reads the same complete week as this card, and the others can still include the week in progress. A project-week carrying fewer than five recorded events is left unrated on the Accountability dimension, because below that the share of activity with a known actor can only land on two or three values and says more about how quiet the week was than about attribution. A project whose only measurable dimension that week was accountability therefore drops out of this average rather than being scored from one or two events, and the card shows a dash when no project in the week clears the bar. The event counts behind every project-week are still recorded, rated or not.