Governance Maturity Score by Project(4.4.5)

Governance maturity is not a single metric. It combines how work reaches completion and how controlled resolutions are. This visual breaks the composite score into its per-project dimensions so you can see not just the overall maturity level, but which dimension is weakest.

What you can conclude

• A project with a low workflow adherence score is completing work that skips the working states its workflow defines: issues jump from a new status straight to done.
• A project with a low control coverage score is delivering issues without logged work or via skipped states; issues closed as abandoned or duplicate are not counted as resolutions, so completions carry less supporting evidence.

How this chart works

Multi-dimension bar chart showing scores (0-100) for each project. Configuration change activity is site-scoped and lives in its own chart on this page. Both dimensions are derived from the week's completions, so a week with no completions supports neither and is left unscored rather than scored 0. Use the date and project filters to track specific teams or periods.

Every bar is read from the same week, the latest complete week in which at least one dimension could be measured, and the week in progress is not plotted. Projects with no measured dimension in that week are not listed, and are counted in the note above the chart. A dimension measured at zero draws a short marker rather than nothing, so it is not mistaken for one that could not be measured. Comparing bar heights is the whole point of a per-project chart, so a bar measured in one week standing beside a bar measured two weeks earlier would not be a comparison. The Portfolio Composite Score card above reads that same week, so the card and the bars cannot describe different weeks.