Project Compliance Leaderboard(5.7.9)

The leaderboard provides the compliance portfolio view at a glance. Every project is ranked by its governance score in its own most recent completed week, best first, with color-coded status. Green means at or above 80 and on target. Amber means below 80 but at or above 60. Red means below 60 and worth attention first.

Which week each bar comes from

This chart reads each project's latest complete week and does not count the week in progress. Projects report in different weeks, so the chart names no single week. Each project is read in the most recent week that has finished for that project, so a project active every week and a project active fortnightly are both shown at their latest settled figure, rather than one of them being dropped for having no row in a single shared week.

The week still in progress is not read at all. A part-finished week holds whichever projects happened to be active in its first days, which is a self-selected subset of the portfolio rather than an early reading of it — and the projects missing from it are not the quiet ones, they are the ones whose activity falls later in the week. Ranking on it inverts the board.

Which projects appear, and which do not

• A project whose own latest completed week carries no score is absent from the board, not drawn at zero. A zero bar is a measurement — the lowest the score can take — and a project that could not be scored has not earned it.
• An absent project is not backfilled from an older week either. A stale score drawn beside fresh ones is indistinguishable from a current one to the reader, and this board answers where each project stands right now.
• So the board can carry fewer bars than there are projects in the range. When a project you expect is missing, its own latest completed week produced no score; Weekly Governance Score by Project on this page shows which weeks it was scored in.

Reading ties

Projects on the same score are ordered by project key. Scores repeat often across a portfolio, and a stable tie-break keeps the middle of the board from reshuffling on an unrelated data change.

What you can conclude

• Red projects score lowest on the control signals MetaFrazo measures. That makes them the natural place to look first; the score is our measurement, not a compliance determination.
• Amber projects sit below target — worth watching, and worth checking whether the trend is improving or declining.
• A board where every bar is green says the control signals we measure are consistent across the portfolio. What that means for the organization is for the organization to decide.

How this chart works

Horizontal bar chart, highest score first, color-coded: green (at or above 80), amber (60-79), red (below 60). Use the date filter to set the range the completed weeks are drawn from. The project filter does not apply — this visual always shows all projects for portfolio comparison.